All-female Russian LoL team Vaevictis Esports lose 52-2 in the LCL: Is this really about giving women a platform or is it just an unfair publicity stunt?

Article contains affiliate links

UPDATE (February 18th 2020): Vaevictis Esports have been kicked out of the LCL, one year after they announced their all-female League of Legends roster.

Riot Games Russia said, as reported by The Loadout: “Unfortunately, the results of the 2019 season showed a huge difference in the results of VAE compared to other LCL teams, which is an unacceptable level of competitiveness in a closed league. In this regard, Vaevictis Esports will skip the 2020 Continental League season.”

Original article (February 17th 2019):

Vaevictis Esports announced an all-female roster last week and the girls have heavily lost their first three matches in the League of Legends Continental League (LCL).

Management describes the team’s formation as an ‘experiment’ to see how they will fare in the league, however from early indications it seems to be nothing more than a publicity stunt that could dent the players’ confidence, argues Esports News UK editor Dom Sacco in this opinion piece.

First off: this story might not involve a UK team, but there’s a few reasons why I’m covering this.
The announcement of this team drew several comments from the UK League community and sparked a separate debate on sexism in esports.
Diversity in esports (or lack thereof) is an important topic and one I haven’t written about in a while, and after watching this team get beaten in their first three matches, I felt inclined to write something.
Vaevictis are currently bottom of the LCL league having lost lost 12-1 to RoX at 21 minutes, 52-2 to Vega Squadron and 20-1 to Dragon Army. The latter game was over before the 20-minute mark.
For me, this is not an experiment. It’s humiliation.

“It’s time to experiment. We would like to check how competitive the women’s team will be on the professional stage and how strong their progress will be.”
Vaevictis Esports

Would Vaevictis Esports make an experiment in the gambling area? It is a game of luck and everyone will have equal chances to win. For example, there are some casino operators not registered at Gamstop for UK players that provide high return to player rates. which means that you are closer to your winnings. Fortunately, there is no kill-death statistics when gambling for real money online.

Back to the esports team, these players are all Diamond elo and several main support. They are going up against top Grandmaster/Challenger players. That in itself shouldn’t happen – I feel bad for the girls because they no doubt will be feeling shit after losing like this.

Maybe it will knock their confidence in the future, maybe it won’t. I’m going to reach out to them after this article to see what they think, but I wanted to get a quick opinion piece off my chest first.
On top of this, in their first match in the LCL embedded below, RoX banned five support champions in the draft phase. The implication of course, being this notion that females ‘can or should only play support champions’.

You could argue RoX were being lighthearted, and the Vaevictis players clearly saw the funny side of it as outlined above.
But this Reddit post on the situation was locked ‘due to an overwhelming amount of sexist comments’.
And you could also argue, you wouldn’t see a team banning like this against an all-male or mixed team (the latter being incredibly rare of course).
At this stage it’s incredibly likely Vaevictis will remain bottom of the league.
So, why have Vaevictis decided to do this? Is it an unfair publicity stunt? Do they really want to promote females in esports? Or is it, as they say, just an experiment before the league changes? Perhaps it could be a mix of all three.

Vaevictis fall 52-2 to Vega Squadron

Riot Games is apparently planning on introducing a franchising system for the LCL in 2020, like the EU LEC and NA LCS.
Vaevictis said in an announcement post (translated from Russian): “It’s no secret that in 2020 we will encounter a new league system, but for now it’s time to experiment.
“First of all, we would like to check how competitive the women’s team will be on the professional stage, how strong the progress of this team will be, and what they will be able to demonstrate in the game.”

“The people who claim sexism isn’t a problem within esports are probably the same people who laugh or make jokes when they see full female roster announcements.”
Billy “Nutri” Wragg, Barrage Esports

Back in 2015, I interviewed a female CSGO side, Team Property, at DreamHack London and in 2016 I spoke to Intel and pro gamer Hege “Hedje” Botnen from LGB eSports’ then all-female CSGO team at IEM Katowice.
Reading these interviews back, not much has changed since then. Yes, we still have female-only tournaments, and yes, some say that’s a good thing to promote women in esports and provide role models for younger girls, while others say it does more to widen the gender divide and prevent us moving towards more regular mixed teams.
It’s easy to forget that esports is technically a mixed activity. It’s not like football, where you have men’s football and women’s football, completely separated. If a woman is good enough at the game, she will get noticed. Just like Scarlett, Remilia (aka Yuno, Maria), Geguri and others.
Why aren’t there more female players at this top level? That’s a harder question to answer, and something that the UK community explored in a bit more detail in some of the Twitter comments I’ve published below.

The Vaevictis roster

  • Top: Diana ‘TR1GGERED’ Ivanchenko
  • Jungle: Aida ‘Merao’ Kazaryan
  • Mid: Elena ‘VioletFairy’ Koval
  • ADC: Ksenia ‘Trianna’ Mescheryakova
  • Support: Nataliya ‘Ankote’ Zayko

‘Attitudes need to shift’ – UK scene reacts

Billy “Nutri” Wragg, experienced UK scene player currently playing as ADC for Barrage, had some points to make on diversity and sexism in esports.
She told Esports News UK: “Attitudes need to shift if we want to see an increase in top tier female competitors.
“Specifically I think it’s important to look at the culture and how we’ve normalized sexism at the moment. I would argue terms such as “e girl” are currently seen as reasonably harmless, but their origins are very sexist and even now the term has a very sexist undertone, but we are at a point of normalization where women are even using this to describe themselves.”
Nutri added on Twitter:

This sparked a bit of a debate, with others adding their opinion, including the following:

We’ll aim to add to these comments as we hear from more people, on Twitter, Discord, or in the comments below.

Article contains affiliate links

20 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments