Team Infused drop UK LoL team after second default loss and Cliff's ban

team infused logo 1

Team Infused’s nightmare start to Season 3 of the ESL UK League of Legends Premiership has continued.
Infused as an organisation have dropped support for their UK League of Legends team due to the number of default losses and a recent player ban.
Their match against Renegades Banditos this week was cancelled and the Banditos picked up a default win. This was due to Infused not being able to put forward a full roster, after their ADC Cliff was banned from League of Legends due to toxicity. He has also picked up three penalty points from ESL UK.


Team Infused’s coach Nihir “Good ADC” Vedd said in a Twitlonger post: “Due to a series of unfortunate events, Infused has dropped support for the ESL premiership League of Legends team. I completely understand this decision and probably would have done the same thing if I was Andrew (the owner of Infused).
“The reason they dropped support for us was because of the number of default wins being awarded to opponent teams, and that players of Infused need to represent the organization – “Infused Cliff” should not have been toxic, especially under that name.
“Looking towards the future, I personally thought it would be better to disband at this point and try again next season. However after talking to the players, the majority of them want to continue playing, albeit not as seriously as we were taking it before. ESL has spoken to both Andrew and I and we’ve agreed on us keeping the spot, while agreeing to a name change so we no longer represent Infused.”
The news comes after Infused picked up a default loss in week one due to their mid-laner pulling out at the last minute, and a 1-0 loss to TCA last week.
Cliff said he was banned due to flaming and trolling, but believes the punishment is too severe.
“I’ve been banned for 14 days for being toxic – deserved according to Riot rules,” he told eSports News UK. “However, I don’t think that toxicitiy should be a bannable offence at all. So it’s undeserved in my eyes, but in Riot’s it’s 101% deserved.”


So, could Cliff have played in tonight’s ESL UK match on a second account?
An ESL spokesperson told eSports News UK: “There’s nothing in the rulebook that explicitly prohibits him from playing on a second account, but he would have at the very least received penalty points for his behaviour, not being a role model in the first place.
“The fact that he has received a player ban from the game itself, he shouldn’t be playing – and as ESL UK has a Challenger Series qualification slot, we believe he should not be playing to the standards that a Challenger Series player should be playing.”
ESL UK is pointing to section 3.4 of its rulebook:
3.4 Code of Conduct – All ESL UK Premiership participants agree to behave in an appropriate and respectful manner towards other participants, spectators, the press, the ESL UK broadcasting team and all members of the ESL UK Premiership administration. By taking part in the competition players and organizers become role models for the community, and should behave accordingly.
The ESL UK spokesperson added: “In the rulebook under 3.4 code of conduct, players who take part in the competition must behave as role models for the community, and should behave accordingly.
“Typically, if someone has just been caught, or made an odd statement, they’d receive a penalty. You have to be very abusive, very toxic to receive a ban. We have, in our ruleset, the ability to create divisions within our ruleset that are not within the rulebook. So if a situation arises we have the power to create a [new] definition.
“In this case, we decided that due to the level of toxicity it was the right call to uphold the ban and forfeit the game. At the same time, a game ban from Riot is a player ban, not an account ban, so Riot has banned him as a player from participating within League of Legends for 14 days.
“That’s my interpretation of it. Bearing in mind if he received the same ban in the Challenger Series, he also wouldn’t be allowed to play for 14 days.”
The means that Cliff will miss next week’s match too, so unless his team find a sub ADC in that time, they will be picking up another default loss next week.


eSports News UK understands the team was originally under the impression that the match could have gone ahead if Cliff had used a second account.


Subscribe
Notify of
guest
8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Grash Goret
5 years ago

Disgusting that players like these exist in UK, but he already got his punishment for being banned on league. And if Riot decided he couldn’t play on any accounts in the 14 days they would ban his smurfs as well. Pretty flawed logic from UK ESL as per usual,

Anonymoose
5 years ago

A player such as Cliff should never have been on a team in the first place. His attitude is disgusting and so is what he says on social media (twitter especially). A completely unprofessional player oblivious to his actions, playing for a professional and we’ll established team. It just doesn’t work together, and his teammates have had to pay the price for that.

Julian Jerko
5 years ago

Pulse Gaming comes into the Regional representing France as one of the best teams in Europe. They performed well in the online qualifiers, finishing in the top eight in all but one, and won three of them outright.